I think I may have an idea
The same volume of water should take longer (twice as long) to reach temperature than the oil. However, the water circuit has a thermostat which effectively means there is much less water than oil in contact with the engine. Only when the water reaches temperature does it flow into the radiator circuit. The oil has no thermostat and is being cooled from the outset.
How does that theory work..?
Advances in Car Technology (Part 2)
-
- ALPINA
- Posts: 7229
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:33 pm
- Location: Pembrokeshire
The cooling water is also a pressurised circuit Add that to the equationsChas wrote:I think I may have an idea
The same volume of water should take longer (twice as long) to reach temperature than the oil. However, the water circuit has a thermostat which effectively means there is much less water than oil in contact with the engine. Only when the water reaches temperature does it flow into the radiator circuit. The oil has no thermostat and is being cooled from the outset.
How does that theory work..?
Not too much...enough Nice to think about a puzzle on occasion.E24man wrote:You have too much time on your hands - I know, I can't talk
I suspect the chief reason is that the oil is being used primarily as a lubricant with some little cooling effect and that the coolant is being used as a, well, it says it all really. The highest temperatures will be at the point of ignition and around the combustion chamber; relative to the coolant the main volume of oil is a fair distance from the highest temperature source and isn't being used to draw heat away from that source.
Or something like that....
I think the oil travelling around the pistons will warm pretty quickly, but has a small volume wrt the sump, as has the main bearing lubricant (with similar caveat).
Want to play, now
Current:
23MY Porsche Macan GTS in Papaya
23MY Cupra Born V3 77kW in Aurora
Previously loved:
ALPINA: E91 B3SBiturbo #127, E92 B3SBiturbo #285, E90 D3Biturbo #097, E85 Roadster S #168 & variety of 'beige' 4 and 6-cyl BMW lumps.
PORSCHE: Macan S, Cayman 981 S, Cayman 981 GTS
23MY Porsche Macan GTS in Papaya
23MY Cupra Born V3 77kW in Aurora
Previously loved:
ALPINA: E91 B3SBiturbo #127, E92 B3SBiturbo #285, E90 D3Biturbo #097, E85 Roadster S #168 & variety of 'beige' 4 and 6-cyl BMW lumps.
PORSCHE: Macan S, Cayman 981 S, Cayman 981 GTS
-
- ALPINA
- Posts: 7229
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:33 pm
- Location: Pembrokeshire
Yes, an odd omission on the E9x. So glad I have the performance steering wheel; my coolant temperature is on the display 99% of the time. Essential in my opinionB10BRW wrote:Have no idea what the water temperature is , as BMW in their wisdom have not fitted a gauge
Current:
23MY Porsche Macan GTS in Papaya
23MY Cupra Born V3 77kW in Aurora
Previously loved:
ALPINA: E91 B3SBiturbo #127, E92 B3SBiturbo #285, E90 D3Biturbo #097, E85 Roadster S #168 & variety of 'beige' 4 and 6-cyl BMW lumps.
PORSCHE: Macan S, Cayman 981 S, Cayman 981 GTS
23MY Porsche Macan GTS in Papaya
23MY Cupra Born V3 77kW in Aurora
Previously loved:
ALPINA: E91 B3SBiturbo #127, E92 B3SBiturbo #285, E90 D3Biturbo #097, E85 Roadster S #168 & variety of 'beige' 4 and 6-cyl BMW lumps.
PORSCHE: Macan S, Cayman 981 S, Cayman 981 GTS
My daily morning commute is about 40 miles. The first 3 miles are B roads and then I'm on the A34/M4.
Whilst the water temperature reaches "normal" by the time I'm getting onto the A34, it isn't until about 10 miles later that I can feel the engine is hitting its sweet spot. This isn't that easy to describe but, before then, more vigorous acceleration results in the engine response feeling/sounding somewhat "thin".
I'm sure this is a reflection of the fact that the engine oil needs about 15 miles of good running before it reaches optimal temperature.
As for why the water and oil reach operating temperatures at different rates, factors such as volume of fluid, specific heat capacity and flowrate through the heat source are all relevant.
And when considering the difference between petrol and diesel engines in terms of reaching operating temperature, I can't help wondering whether the different flashpoints are a factor, along with combustion chamber pressures & temperatures and engine block design. Added to this, we can then factor in the thermal effciciency of the two fuels and it starts to get really complicated!!!
What really impresses me is the way that petrol engines are now achieving levels of economy that diesel engines used to - such that the differential between the two is beginning to close. For example, the 3.0 litre twin turbo in the B3 BT is achieving low 30s in mpg compared with the 3.0 V6 Turbo diesel in my Espace which struggles to get above 32mpg. Not quite a "like for like" comparison but one that begins to make the point, nonetheless.
Whilst the water temperature reaches "normal" by the time I'm getting onto the A34, it isn't until about 10 miles later that I can feel the engine is hitting its sweet spot. This isn't that easy to describe but, before then, more vigorous acceleration results in the engine response feeling/sounding somewhat "thin".
I'm sure this is a reflection of the fact that the engine oil needs about 15 miles of good running before it reaches optimal temperature.
As for why the water and oil reach operating temperatures at different rates, factors such as volume of fluid, specific heat capacity and flowrate through the heat source are all relevant.
And when considering the difference between petrol and diesel engines in terms of reaching operating temperature, I can't help wondering whether the different flashpoints are a factor, along with combustion chamber pressures & temperatures and engine block design. Added to this, we can then factor in the thermal effciciency of the two fuels and it starts to get really complicated!!!
What really impresses me is the way that petrol engines are now achieving levels of economy that diesel engines used to - such that the differential between the two is beginning to close. For example, the 3.0 litre twin turbo in the B3 BT is achieving low 30s in mpg compared with the 3.0 V6 Turbo diesel in my Espace which struggles to get above 32mpg. Not quite a "like for like" comparison but one that begins to make the point, nonetheless.
Charles
Teacher of Chemistry and driver of ALPINAs - not necessarily in that order
B3S Touring (49/116) - been to the moon and now on the way back!
Renault Grand Espace - not mine but the wife's!
Teacher of Chemistry and driver of ALPINAs - not necessarily in that order
B3S Touring (49/116) - been to the moon and now on the way back!
Renault Grand Espace - not mine but the wife's!